{"id":1533,"date":"2023-10-23T23:00:31","date_gmt":"2023-10-23T20:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.zehrataskin.com\/?p=1533"},"modified":"2023-10-23T23:15:03","modified_gmt":"2023-10-23T20:15:03","slug":"yuksekogretimin-sermayesi-arastirma-degerlendirme-ve-metriklere-hapsedilmis-akademi-uzerine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.zehrataskin.com\/index.php\/2023\/10\/23\/yuksekogretimin-sermayesi-arastirma-degerlendirme-ve-metriklere-hapsedilmis-akademi-uzerine\/","title":{"rendered":"Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretimin sermayesi, ara\u015ft\u0131rma de\u011ferlendirme ve metriklere hapsedilmi\u015f akademi \u00fczerine…"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Bu hafta \u015fahane bir konferansta (6. Uluslararas\u0131 Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim \u00c7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 Konferans\u0131<\/a>) davetli konu\u015fmac\u0131yd\u0131m ve konu\u015fmam\u0131n ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak “say\u0131lar\u0131n \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7mek<\/a>” c\u00fcmlesini se\u00e7tim. T\u00fcm vurgum da say\u0131lar\u0131n \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7menin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilmesi i\u00e7in ara\u015ft\u0131rma de\u011ferlendirmeden \u00f6nce ara\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n ne demek oldu\u011funu anlamak gerekti\u011fi \u00fczerineydi. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ne tesad\u00fcf bug\u00fcn European Universities – Critical Futures<\/a> konferans\u0131n\u0131n metriklerle y\u00f6netilen \u00fcniversite sisteminin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 oturumunda Jakub’un ilk slayt\u0131 da olduk\u00e7a hakl\u0131 bir soru i\u015fareti ile sonland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir “beyond metrics” idi (Bkz. \u015eekil 1). \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc art\u0131k metriklerin \u00f6tesinde bir akademiyi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnme zaman\u0131 geldi. Ancak bunu nas\u0131l yapaca\u011f\u0131m\u0131z hala b\u00fcy\u00fck bir soru i\u015fareti. <\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
\u015eekil 1. Dr. Jakub Krzeski taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan sunumdan bir slayt<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc etkinlikte ben de davetli panelist olarak akl\u0131mdaki soru i\u015faretlerini somut \u00f6rnekler \u00fczerinden ilettim. \u00c7ok sevilmese de somut \u00f6rnekleri, hatta bazen anekdotlar\u0131 \u00e7evre \u00fclkeden bir akademisyen olarak t\u00fcm konu\u015fmalar\u0131mda \u00e7ok s\u0131k kullan\u0131yorum \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc s\u00f6zde veya yaz\u0131lan raporlarda her \u015fey m\u00fckemmel. AB e\u015fitlik, \u00e7e\u015fitlilik ve \u00e7ok dillili\u011fe b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem veriyor. “Sorumlu ara\u015ft\u0131rma” en \u00f6nemli g\u00fcndem maddesi ve metriklerin ara\u015ft\u0131rma de\u011ferlendirmesinde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6nerilmiyor. Ancak bizim g\u00fcnl\u00fck hayatta ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z deneyimler s\u00f6ylenenlerden \u00e7ok farkl\u0131. Ya\u011fmac\u0131 yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k \u00fczerine yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda bu konuda konu\u015facak son \u00fclke T\u00fcrkiye diyorlar. Ayn\u0131 \u015feyleri herhangi bir s\u0131ralama sisteminde ilk 10’da yer alan \u00fcniversitelerden bir akademisyen dile getirdi\u011finde -ki \u00e7o\u011funlukla hepsinin ilk 10’u ayn\u0131 \u00fcniversiteler biliyorsunuz- akademinin b\u00fcy\u00fck bir sorununa \u0131\u015f\u0131k tutmu\u015f oluyor. Sorun bizim sorunumuz, \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm yollar\u0131n\u0131 da en iyi ancak biz bulabiliriz ancak bu hi\u00e7 \u00f6nemli de\u011fil. Duymak istedikleri ses bizim sesimiz de\u011fil. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Konferanslarda hep ayn\u0131 ki\u015filer e\u015fitlik konu\u015fuyor. \u00c7e\u015fitlilik olsun diye davet edilen akademisyenler zaten ismi olan, ayr\u0131cal\u0131kl\u0131 akademisyenler. Di\u011fer taraftan at\u0131flar\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesinde i\u00e7erik analizine ge\u00e7ilmeli diyoruz ama ortada \u00e7evre \u00fclkelere veya dezavantajl\u0131 gruplara (kad\u0131n akademisyenler, gen\u00e7 ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131lar vs.) kar\u015f\u0131 bilin\u00e7li bir g\u00f6rmezden gelme varsa ve kasti olarak at\u0131f yap\u0131lm\u0131yorsa at\u0131flar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finin analiz edilmesi ger\u00e7ekten iddia edildi\u011fi gibi “kalitenin de\u011ferlendirilmesi”ni sa\u011flar m\u0131, yoksa her t\u00fcrl\u00fc yarat\u0131c\u0131 “sorumlu” giri\u015fimin hayat\u0131m\u0131za yeni metrikler eklemekten ba\u015fka bir i\u015flevi yok mu gibi bir s\u00fcr\u00fc soru i\u015fareti var kafamda. Hi\u00e7birinin net bir yan\u0131t\u0131 yokken metriklerin \u00f6tesinde bir de\u011ferlendirme sistemine ge\u00e7ilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn m\u00fc \u015fimdilik bilmiyorum. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

De\u011ferlendirmelerin iyile\u015ftirilmesi i\u00e7in sunulan yegane alternatif: Akran de\u011ferlendirmesi<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130stanbul’daki konferansta a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki paragrafa de\u011findim (bkz. \u015eekil 2). Konferans\u0131n di\u011fer davetli konu\u015fmac\u0131s\u0131 olan ilgili derginin e\u015f edit\u00f6r\u00fc bu a\u00e7\u0131klamaya inanmakta g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fck \u00e7ekti. Ancak bu a\u00e7\u0131klama var ve uzun s\u00fcredir orada duruyor. Bence daha da k\u00f6t\u00fcs\u00fc i\u00e7eride de bu edit\u00f6r\u00fcn sahip oldu\u011fu co\u011frafik \u00f6nyarg\u0131n\u0131n hakl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na kendini inand\u0131rm\u0131\u015f binlerce akademisyenin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131. Ben \u00fclkeden ka\u00e7abilmek i\u00e7in k\u00f6t\u00fc ara\u015ft\u0131rma k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcmle \u0130ngilizce yay\u0131n yapmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan bir akademisyen de\u011filim ve bu r\u00f6portajda bahsedilen \u00f6zelliklerin tam tersi \u00f6zellikleri ta\u015f\u0131yan \u015fahane ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131lar biliyorum. Hi\u00e7biri bu \u00f6nyarg\u0131y\u0131 hak etmiyor. Ancak sistem tamamen hakem de\u011ferlendirmesine dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda elimizdeki malzeme bu. Maalesef fazlas\u0131 de\u011fil. <\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
\u015eekil 2: https:\/\/echer.org\/interview-with-simon-marginson\/<\/a> <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Di\u011fer taraftan i\u00e7erideki akran de\u011ferlendirmesine de g\u00fcvenmiyorum. Yay\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 alan\u0131n en \u00f6nemli dergilerinde yapm\u0131\u015f birinin do\u00e7entlik de\u011ferlendirmesinde alanla zerre ili\u015fkisi olmayan ama nepotizm sayesinde profes\u00f6r koltu\u011funda oturan birinden “alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda at ko\u015fturmu\u015ftur” raporunu da g\u00f6rd\u00fcm. “Sizin akl\u0131n\u0131za Prof. X’e at\u0131f yapmak gelmediyse benim i\u00e7imden de size yay\u0131nlanabilir demek gelmiyor” diye yersen \u00e7ift k\u00f6rleme hakem de\u011ferlendirmesinde ret tavsiyesi veren hakem de. Tamamen akran de\u011ferlendirmesine dayanan bir sistemin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 beni inan\u0131lmaz korkutuyor. Daha ba\u015fka \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmler olmal\u0131 ama ne? [Spoiler alert] A\u00e7\u0131k eri\u015fim demeyin, onun kendine hayr\u0131 kald\u0131 m\u0131 ondan emin de\u011filim. Yaz\u0131n\u0131n devam\u0131nda onunla ilgili bir k\u0131s\u0131m da var :=) [\/spoiler alert]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130\u015fte bu soruya yan\u0131t ararken son zamanlarda keyifle okudu\u011fum iki kitaptan biriyle devam etmek istedim \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bu \u015fahane kitaptan al\u0131nt\u0131larla bizi bu d\u00fczene kavu\u015fturan ad\u0131mlar\u0131 listelemek istiyorum. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretimin Sermayesi<\/strong> (Capital of Higher Education<\/strong><\/em>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bu y\u0131l benim i\u00e7in -yeni \u00e7\u0131kan kitaplar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan- olduk\u00e7a doyurucu ge\u00e7ti. \u015eef Emanuel Kulczycki’nin the Evaluation Game<\/a> kitab\u0131 \u00fczerine daha \u00f6nce yazm\u0131\u015ft\u0131m<\/a>. Bu blog yaz\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7in rehber olarak Krystian Szadkowski taraf\u0131ndan kaleme al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Capital in Higher Education: A Critique of the Political Economy of the Sector<\/a> kitab\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131m. Hala okumad\u0131ysan\u0131z \u00e7ok \u015fey kaybediyor olabilirsiniz :=) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00d6l\u00e7emedi\u011fimiz \u015feyi ger\u00e7ekten y\u00f6netemez miyiz?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00c7ok bilmi\u015flerin ara\u015ft\u0131rma de\u011ferlendirmede say\u0131sal metriklerin geride b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin her tavsiyeyi \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fckleri (\u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fcklerini sand\u0131klar\u0131) arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131 bu: \u00d6l\u00e7emedi\u011fimiz \u015feyi y\u00f6netemeyiz! Bazen Drucker’e atfediyorlar, bazen Deming’e. \u0130ddia ettikleri \u015fey \u015fu: Y\u00f6netebilmek i\u00e7in \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcyoruz. Mahcubiyet i\u00e7eriyor gibi bazen, bazen “deli misin, biz keyfimize mi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcyoruz her \u015feyi” der gibi. \u00d6l\u00e7me i\u015fini Krystian nas\u0131l tan\u0131ml\u0131yor bakal\u0131m: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

It (measure) is a medium of subsumption as an enforced relationship between capital and labour, allowing capital to establish and define its parameters.<\/strong> It enables calculation, and once the calculation is complete, its result can quickly become a norm or yardstick, for the reality being measured. Commensurate entities are obliged to conform to the norm<\/strong>. The measure could thus serve as a vehicle for an empty, homogeneous, linear progress. (s. 125)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Daha \u00f6nce at\u0131f dizinlerinin \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f hikayesini yazm\u0131\u015ft\u0131m: https:\/\/www.zehrataskin.com\/index.php\/2023\/08\/24\/sci-ssci-yayin-yapmanin-ipuclari\/<\/a> \u00d6l\u00e7meye y\u00f6nelik sonsuz arzunun somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ve g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde norm\/k\u0131stas haline gelmesinin en \u00f6nemli ad\u0131mlar\u0131ndan biri \u015f\u00fcphesiz at\u0131f dizinlerinin ortaya \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131. Kitapta \u00f6ncesi ve bibliyometrinin\/s\u0131ralama sistemlerinin temellerinin ortaya \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n hikayesi de var. Benim en keyifle okudu\u011fum b\u00f6l\u00fcmler de onlar. Kitab\u0131n early bibliometrics<\/em> b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki paragrafla ba\u015fl\u0131yor ve bu k\u0131s\u0131mdan itibaren \u00f6nemli sorular sorduruyor. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

By counting references, articles or the numbers of \u201cbrilliant minds\u201d <\/strong>employed by universities, they were comparing academic institutions or scholars or preparing and developing rankings or indexes <\/strong>that would corroborate the scientific identity and contribute to the prosperity of Psychology as an academic discipline (Godin, 2006) (s. 130).<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

En \u015fahane beyinleri kaynak\u00e7a sayarak saptayabilece\u011fimizi iddia eden ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131n\u0131n fikri Lotka Yasas\u0131n\u0131n bilimsel yay\u0131nlar i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131nca bo\u015fa \u00e7\u0131k\u0131yor asl\u0131nda. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131lar\u0131n sadece \u00e7ok az\u0131 10 makalenin \u00fcst\u00fcnde \u00fcretime sahipken, b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00e7o\u011funluk belirli bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yaln\u0131zca bir\/iki yay\u0131n \u00fcretiyor. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla e\u015fitler aras\u0131nda bir yar\u0131\u015f <\/em>s\u00f6z konusu. Tabi ki \u00f6l\u00e7me sevdal\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 bu ger\u00e7ek durduram\u0131yor. Hemen i\u015fe yarar bir ba\u015fka yasa bulunuveriyor: Bradford yasas\u0131. \u0130\u015fte bu yasa da bug\u00fcn bildi\u011fimiz anlamdaki at\u0131f dizinleri ve onlar\u0131n \u00fcretti\u011fi say\u0131lar\u0131n \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f noktas\u0131 oluyor. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

… However, a few years later, in 1934, a fundamental principle governing the modern analysis of productivity and estimating the value of academic publications, the so-called Bradford\u2019s law, was crystallised. This law states that the core of the most important literature in a given area of science is published only in a narrow group of journals<\/strong>. Searching for valuable texts in any other group of journals yields \u201cdiminishing returns\u201d<\/strong>. Building on Bradford\u2019s law, Eugene Garfield developed the Science Citation Index, a revolutionary tool for measuring science, which he described in his 1955 article and which was commercially implemented in 1963.<\/em> (s. 131)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Bu arada bir k\u00fct\u00fcphaneci olarak minik bir parantez a\u00e7ay\u0131m bu k\u0131sma. Bu yasalar k\u00fct\u00fcphane koleksiyon geli\u015ftirilmesi i\u00e7in yard\u0131mc\u0131 bir ara\u00e7 olarak kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda verimli. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc k\u00fct\u00fcphanelerin kaynaklar\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131. Sadece en \u00e7ok kullan\u0131lan kaynaklar\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131 laz\u0131m. Bu gibi yasalar asl\u0131nda buna hizmet ediyor. Ediyordu demek daha do\u011fru belki. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc say\u0131sal \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131rma de\u011ferlendirmesinde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131yla hepsi birer k\u0131stas veya norm olarak “kaliteyi saptayabilen y\u00f6ntemler” olarak tan\u0131mland\u0131 ve bu da g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcze kadar gelen s\u00fcrede akademideki say\u0131sal de\u011ferlendirme yolunun ta\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 muntazaman d\u00f6\u015fedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kitab\u0131n bu k\u0131sm\u0131ndan hemen sonra Krystian bat\u0131da egemen olan ve Derek de Solla Price taraf\u0131ndan \u015fekillendirilen “bilimin bilimi” (science of science<\/em>) bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemli bir ad\u0131m oldu\u011funun hakk\u0131n\u0131 vererek dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken bir s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131l\u0131ktan bahsediyor: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Price\u2019s ontological perspective on science is atomistic; he views it as composed of individual scientists, or \u201cmolecules,\u201d each behaving distinctively<\/strong>. Consequently, scientometrics, in Price\u2019s view, aims to determine meaningful averages from the entirety of these behaviours<\/strong>. His primary unit of analysis is the individual scientist<\/strong>, focusing on eminence, productivity, and understanding talent distribution topography<\/strong>.<\/em>.. The fundamental unit for tracking scholars\u2019 activities is the article, which Price believes emerged from the solidification of the intellectual property rights regime. He regarded authorship and prestige through publications as \u201ca social device rather than a technique of evaluating the quanta of information\u201d<\/strong> (Price, 1963, p. 65), asserting that scientists were more driven to write papers than to read them<\/strong> (Price, 1963, p. 70)… Garfield\u2019s Science Citation Index <\/strong>aimed to visualise and objectify relations within these invisible colleges by indexing references, thus helping scientists manage information overload<\/strong> (s. 135). <\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Yukar\u0131da da a\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde ifade edildi\u011fi gibi Price’\u0131n yay\u0131n say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n devasa art\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan duydu\u011fu endi\u015fe, bu yay\u0131nlar\u0131n kontrol\u00fcn\u00fcn sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in at\u0131f dizinlerinin geli\u015ftirilmesi gibi t\u00fcm olaylar asl\u0131nda literat\u00fcr takibini\/kontrol\u00fcn\u00fc kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131 ama\u00e7l\u0131yordu. Bir k\u00fct\u00fcphaneci olarak sizi temin edebilirim. Garfield’\u0131n ana amac\u0131 ya da dile\u011fi de bilimin onun \u00fcretti\u011fi say\u0131larla de\u011ferlendirilmesi de\u011fildi. Kitaptaki bu b\u00f6l\u00fcm Alfred Nobel’in “dinamiti bulmayacakt\u0131k hac\u0131” pi\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlatt\u0131 biraz. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

One of the Garfield\u2019s goals was to create a tool that would aid the historical and sociological study of science<\/strong> (Zuckerman, 2018). At the same time, the creator of the index himself protested from the very beginning against the use of the index to evaluate individual scientists or to objectively determine the value of specific publications or contributions to science deserving of<\/strong>, say, a Nobel Prize. However, history has developed somewhat differently than Garfield initially wished.<\/strong> As Paul Wouters rightly claimed, \u201ccitation is the product of citation indexer, not scientist\u201d <\/strong>(1999, p. 4), it is a second-order representation of science, \u201ca mirror image of the reference\u201d <\/strong>(1999, p. 11). In measuring and visualising the system of referencing in science, the actual helpful practice of scientists, Garfield, with his Science Citation Index, contributed substantially to the establishment of the actual political economy of science\u2014the domination of the abstractly expressed and quantified value over the use value in scientific communication. <\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Peki devam\u0131nda ne mi oluyor? Bilimsel dergiler i\u00e7in yay\u0131n ve at\u0131f say\u0131lar\u0131yla hesaplanan etki fakt\u00f6r\u00fc kanal\u0131yla kazan\u0131lan “prestij” akademinin tamamen sermaye kontrol\u00fcne girmesine sebep oluyor. Asl\u0131nda sadece o da de\u011fil, k\u00fct\u00fcphanelerin dergi se\u00e7imlerinin de kullan\u0131c\u0131 talep ve beklentileriyle de\u011fil, kaliteyi \u00f6l\u00e7t\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc iddia eden bu say\u0131sal de\u011ferle yap\u0131lmas\u0131 k\u00fct\u00fcphane koleksionlar\u0131n\u0131n da tektiple\u015fmesine sebebiyet veriyor… ve t\u00fcm d\u00fcnya uzun y\u0131llard\u0131r kalitenin say\u0131larla \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclebildi\u011fi sanr\u0131s\u0131yla bu sistemi kullanmaya devam ediyor. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

… because Garfield succeeded in constructing a quantitative index that showed the hierarchy between the journals he included and allowed it to be objectified as a hierarchy of contributions to science and, thus, a quantitative scale of prestige… The JIF encapsulated in the abstract measures certain social relations in global science, reinforcing the impetus for treating citations as the proper and almost sole currency within the field<\/strong>. It was supported not only by the line of reflection on the measurement of academic labour that preceded it but also by concrete social processes of creating and disseminating metrics in higher education and science systems. The design and implementation of the JIF was the culmination of efforts to develop measures of the science and higher education landscape, which opened the door to its further capitalist subsumption<\/strong><\/em> (s. 138).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Dahas\u0131 var…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

As a quantitative measure designed to assess the relative importance and impact of scientific journals, the JIF was a pivotal point in the development of metrics in science and became an essential tool for measuring the scientific impact and prestige of journals and, by extension, the researchers who published in them<\/strong>… As government and capital demands for more comprehensive evaluation tools increased, so did the complexity of metrics. The proliferation of different indicators allowed for a more granular examination of different aspects of academic work<\/strong>. Nevertheless, the emergence of the JIF as the cornerstone metric<\/strong> for evaluating journals controlled by capitalist publishers has done capital a favour<\/strong><\/em> (s. 139).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Sonras\u0131nda at\u0131f dizinleri, kapitalist yay\u0131nevleri ve onlar\u0131n \u00fcretti\u011fi her t\u00fcrl\u00fc metrik akademiyi \u015fekillendirirken 2000’lerin ba\u015f\u0131nda kafas\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan birilerinin sordu\u011fu “yahu entelekt\u00fcel sermaye bizim, kamu kayna\u011f\u0131 bizim, biz neden cebimizde ne var ne yoksa onlara veriyoruz?” hakl\u0131 sorusuyla yeni bir \u00e7a\u011f a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131yor. A\u00e7\u0131k eri\u015fim \u00e7a\u011f\u0131. E peki ne oldu sonra derseniz bir sonraki b\u00f6l\u00fcme ho\u015f geldiniz. \u0130yi ba\u015flayan ama sonuda ba\u015frol karakterin \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir drama evrilen bir hikaye o. Mendillerinizi haz\u0131rlay\u0131n.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kapitalist ‘a\u00e7\u0131k eri\u015fim’<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bu hafta (23-27 Ekim) Uluslararas\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131k Eri\u015fim Haftas\u0131. Ancak a\u00e7\u0131k eri\u015fim uzunca s\u00fcredir o canh\u0131ra\u015f savundu\u011fumuz a\u00e7\u0131k eri\u015fim de\u011fil; kapitalist a\u00e7\u0131k eri\u015fim. Her renk a\u00e7\u0131k eri\u015fimin kazan\u00e7 getiren taraf\u0131 bulundu ve en di\u015fli a\u00e7\u0131k eri\u015fim neferleri de dahil hepsi kesesini doldurdu. Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretimin entelekt\u00fcel sermayesi para olup yay\u0131nc\u0131lar\u0131n cebine girdi. T\u00fcm bu sistemi Krystian “kapitalist a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k” olarak tan\u0131ml\u0131yor ve bu kapitalist a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131 da \u00fc\u00e7 s\u0131n\u0131fa ay\u0131r\u0131yor:<\/p>\n\n\n\n